5 min read

Weekly Combine Newsletter: Two more coaches join Brian Flores race claim

Weekly Combine Newsletter: Two more coaches join Brian Flores race claim

The race-based class action complaint filed by former NFL head coach Brian Flores has taken a step forward with two more black coaches joining the action before the United States District Court- Southern District of New York.

The two men, Steve Wilks, who coached the Arizona Cardinals for only one season in 2018, and Ray Horton, a veteran assistant coach, were added to the amended complaint on Thursday. Flores, the former Miami Dolphins head coach, originally lodged the complaint.

In the high-profile federal civil rights lawsuit, Flores accuses the NFL of "a tortured and unacceptable history with race relations that requires immediate focus ..." and detailed his history of what he says was discrimination in hiring practices because of his race.

Both Wilks and Horton also allege they were not given any chance to succeed or be promoted in their respective coaching positions. Flores also amended his original complaint to include developments since it was filed. These include the Houston Texans removing him from consideration for their head coach search and that the Dolphins refused to remunerate him further under his contract.

Since the complaint, the Texans hired Lovie Smith, who is black, as head coach. Whilst Flores won a job as a defensive coach with the Pittsburgh Steelers.    

As previously reported in February, Michael McCann, a legal professor and Director of the Sports and Entertainment Institute of the University of New Hampshire, said during a webinar conducted by Sportico that this lawsuit was the most significant challenge currently facing the NFL. Professor McCann also added a class action of this nature would usually need about "20 or 25 people". Therefore, whilst the additions of Wilks and Horton is a progression for the action, there is still a lot of work that needs to be done.

It has also been suggested that the lawsuit faces difficulties because- as it requires Court certification- the NFL is likely to argue it should be tossed, relying on arguments they have used in the past, such as employees are bound to arbitrate grievances by NFL Rules and employment agreements.

Flores is among those to have spoken out about forced arbitration agreements and has supported recent legislative reforms against them progressing through the U.S. Congress.

The NFL is also likely to argue each coach's circumstances are unique and they were not discriminated against as part of a blanket policy.

Mr Flores, and other claimants, are being represented by high-profile New York employment firm Wigdor LLP.

The matter is set for a pre-trial conference on 29 April.

Related Story

Super Bowl in tow, the NFL has a litigation problem but one its not afraid to fight
Whilst attention has finally shifted to the National Football League’s showpiece Super Bowl, the NFL remains the most litigated sport in the world. Three recent legal issues, in particular, have distracted the build-up to the match and have the potential to cause damage to the NFL’s long-term image.…
Forced arbitration Bill passes U.S. House, NFL plaintiff Flores among supporters
Proposed legislation targeting forced arbitration clauses, introduced to Congress last March, has passed a U.S. House of Representatives vote late Thursday[U.S. time]. The legislation would impact U.S. sports arbitration and assist high-profile legal matters, including ex-NFL Coach Brian Flores’s ra…

Sports Law Combine now provides our weekly combine newsletter by email to all members. To unlock access to all our articles, click here for details about our individual or business subscriptions.

If you missed our latest articles, here are Sports Law Combine's published articles from the past seven days.

No reprieve for 17y/o union player in careless doping case
A rugby union player representing Australia at the 2016 World Rugby Under-20 Championships was found to be reckless with substances taken during university 10-months before a positive test at those Championships, in a decision from the 31 Awards released for the first time on the Court of Arbitratio…
CAS confirms ban for cyclist’s abnormal biological passport, set for Swiss challenge
The Spanish professional cyclist Raúl Alarcón had appealed a four-year doping suspension to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (‘CAS’) however, a Panel upheld the UCI’s Anti-Doping Tribunal decision to suspend him for four years. Alarcón has now stated he has appealed the CAS decision to the Swiss F…
CAS provides update on Russian proceedings: Stays denied and long waits ahead
Russian sporting authorities are battling to make any progress in overturning mass exclusions of their athletes from world sports competitions due to the Ukrainian conflict, as an update provided by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (‘CAS’) demonstrates the extent of proceedings and workload the Ru…
No legal basis to overturn IOC decision to withhold figure skating medal ceremony
Seven U.S. figure skaters who were denied a medal ceremony for their silver medal-winning performance in February’s Winter Olympics failed in their bid to get recognition because they had no “legal basis” to do so, according to an Ad-Hoc Panel in a just published decision of the Court of

© Copyright 2022 Sports Law Combine